<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New National Advisory Board for Army</title>
	<atom:link href="http://salvationist.ca/2009/11/new-national-advisory-board-for-army/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://salvationist.ca/2009/11/new-national-advisory-board-for-army/</link>
	<description>The Voice of The Salvation Army in Canada and Bermuda</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 15:42:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: F.Keith Pond</title>
		<link>http://salvationist.ca/2009/11/new-national-advisory-board-for-army/comment-page-1/#comment-1705</link>
		<dc:creator>F.Keith Pond</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Dec 2009 16:04:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://salvationist.ca/?p=4445#comment-1705</guid>
		<description>Re: National Advisory Board

An excellent direction to take but composition of the NAB is lacking, as indicated by other commentators.The gender balance is vey good however there is an obvious absence of ethnic and geographical representation. One could say that the national organisations represented have a pulse on various Canadian communities however it would not be first hand.Representation from the Maritimes, Quebec,Praries, Territories and First Nations communities would have been more logical.
Current NAB membership includes very credible and highly qualified people but representation needs to be more diversified.The Army of the &quot;whosever&quot; appears not to be.... based on NAB membership.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: National Advisory Board</p>
<p>An excellent direction to take but composition of the NAB is lacking, as indicated by other commentators.The gender balance is vey good however there is an obvious absence of ethnic and geographical representation. One could say that the national organisations represented have a pulse on various Canadian communities however it would not be first hand.Representation from the Maritimes, Quebec,Praries, Territories and First Nations communities would have been more logical.<br />
Current NAB membership includes very credible and highly qualified people but representation needs to be more diversified.The Army of the &#8220;whosever&#8221; appears not to be&#8230;. based on NAB membership.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A concerned Albertan</title>
		<link>http://salvationist.ca/2009/11/new-national-advisory-board-for-army/comment-page-1/#comment-1536</link>
		<dc:creator>A concerned Albertan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 16:08:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://salvationist.ca/?p=4445#comment-1536</guid>
		<description>I am glad that I am not the only person who saw this same issue. I am sure there are some qualified individuals who could help the Salvation Army in advising from the Prairie provinces and from the East Coast! I would like to hear from Newfoundland about this concern since they have a large number of Salvationists overall in Canada.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am glad that I am not the only person who saw this same issue. I am sure there are some qualified individuals who could help the Salvation Army in advising from the Prairie provinces and from the East Coast! I would like to hear from Newfoundland about this concern since they have a large number of Salvationists overall in Canada.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Arkell</title>
		<link>http://salvationist.ca/2009/11/new-national-advisory-board-for-army/comment-page-1/#comment-1529</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Arkell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 22:12:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://salvationist.ca/?p=4445#comment-1529</guid>
		<description>I do find this interesting and somewhat disturbing as well.  I would be curioius if someone could enlighten us on the selection process for this advisory board and what is meant by &#039;national&#039;.  Obviously this does not refer to national representation???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do find this interesting and somewhat disturbing as well.  I would be curioius if someone could enlighten us on the selection process for this advisory board and what is meant by &#8216;national&#8217;.  Obviously this does not refer to national representation???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A concerned westerner.</title>
		<link>http://salvationist.ca/2009/11/new-national-advisory-board-for-army/comment-page-1/#comment-1525</link>
		<dc:creator>A concerned westerner.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 18:42:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://salvationist.ca/?p=4445#comment-1525</guid>
		<description>A &quot;National&quot; Advisory Board comprised, with 1 exception, entirely of representatives from Ontario amd, more specifically, from the GTA??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A &#8220;National&#8221; Advisory Board comprised, with 1 exception, entirely of representatives from Ontario amd, more specifically, from the GTA??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

