In a world that seems to cry “boring!” every time the preacher rises to the pulpit, what hope remains for the art and discipline of preaching? Does the preaching ministry have a future in the Salvation Amy? Perhaps preachers themselves are among those tempted to offer the most immediate response: “Of course preaching has a future! We're The Salvation Army; we exist to preach the Gospel of Jesus Christ. We are convinced that God's Word has something to say that can truly make a difference in the hearts and lives of our people. We believe in the preaching ministry.”

While this answer may initially sound quite satisfying, how might people in our pews respond? How are they receiving our homiletic efforts? A few years ago I listened to a layperson speaking at a preaching conference. He was there primarily to lead the introductory worship prior to the presenting preacher. In between the songs and prayers, he offered some words of wisdom that had a profound impact upon my own preaching perspective. He talked about going to church every Sunday, yearning to encounter the living God, longing to hear some hopeful word that would change his life. He talked about his struggle to sort out what preachers today were saying and how real life connections were to be made. He spoke about going away Sunday after Sunday, mostly disappointed, having simply endured the sermon and having no clue what the point of the message really was.

This pew-sitter's perspective does not exist in isolation. Preaching is hard work. Effective preaching is even harder. This is not a new insight for the Church. Anthony Trollope in his 1857 work Barchester Towers certainly thought so when he suggested: “There is no greater hardship inflicted on humankind than the necessity of listening to sermons. No one can rid themselves of the preaching clergyman. He is the bore of the age.” Yet, so much more is desired, wrote Trollope: “That we may be able to leave the house of God without that anxious longing for escape, which is the common consequence of most sermons.”

How are we to respond to these tensions? Is weak preaching a widespread problem in The Salvation Army? Is the preacher solely responsible? Is the problem circumstantial, as today's preachers struggle to sort through the burden of their administrative and pastoral duties? Even with the very best of intentions, the days of the week pass quickly and the doing of ministry crowds out opportunity for the kind of in-depth study, exegesis and theological thinking that all sermons require. How do we sort it all out? How do we discern our level of effectiveness? How do we ensure preaching has a strong viable future in The Salvation Army?

Let's return to the basics. If we say we believe in the preaching ministry, as stated earlier, than can we name what we believe about the preaching ministry? Renewing our basic convictions about preaching is a strong step toward strengthening our preaching tradition.

Here are six convictions that guide us.

Preaching is a high and holy calling. There is a great danger that postmodern preachers may quickly lose sight of this truth. Preaching has been God's communication plan from the beginning of time―first, through the prophets, second, through his Son and, finally, through his Spirit. John Wycliffe (1329-1384), noted pre-Reformation preacher, once said: “The highest service to which one could attain is to preach the word of God.” When preachers rise to the pulpit, they stand to represent the voice of God in that time and space. The preacher's spoken words become God's words. What preacher hasn't felt the burden of this responsibility and the weightiness that comes in trying to make sure we get it right! The danger is that emerging styles of worship are challenging the place of biblical proclamation. Postmodernists would prefer not to listen to sermons but to move among interactive stations using visual displays and pre-recorded music. As Vineyard Pastor Don Best suggests in his book Exploring the Worship Spectrum, “proclamation is reduced to speculation, role playing or self-help therapy.” While these forms of worship may bring a refreshing approach to the gathered community, they cannot replace the need for biblical proclamation and a preacher who stands in God's authority, seeking to be faithful to his/her calling.

Preaching is a biblical task. All sermons begin with Scripture, preferably one single text that will dominate the preaching event. Many preachers today, however, seem to prefer a more topical approach. This seems indicative of the training we have given over the last 20 to 30 years. Preachers choose a subject before preaching and then work to find a text that will support their ideas. Very rarely is a depth of true biblical exegesis achieved because the preacher works with a scope that is simply too broad. This issue is further challenged by the age of technology in which we now live, as preachers often find themselves drawn to Internet sermons or books by inspirational Christian writers to help shape their own Sunday message. These become the catalyst for the sermon when our own creative abilities seem dry or used up. If we are not careful, it is someone else's work that ends up dominating the sermon, rather than the preacher's own deliberate wrestling with a chosen text. How do we turn this tide? Perhaps it is more about the preacher's confidence to actually locate a sermon within one designated biblical passage. We must trust our creative energies within the homiletic process and our own ability to hear God's message through the one text alone. In this way, we will achieve stronger biblical preaching.

Preaching is a theological task. John Stott has suggested that “the kind of God we believe in determines the kind of sermons we preach.” It's a rather daunting thought as we contemplate how exposed the preacher's own belief system becomes in the preaching moment. Yet every time we preach our goal is to “do theology.” Our goal is to help our listeners understand where God is in the text; how he is acting, what is being revealed about his nature and character and how all of this relates to our world today. So the questions beg to be asked: “How is God showing up in our sermons? How are our sermons representing God to our people?” Faithful proclamation will seek a depth of theological reflection that will boldly name the big questions of faith and how God is presently responding to trouble in our world. This is theology.



Preaching is a creative task. A few years ago, one of my students came bounding into my office at the Training College with a pressing announcement. “It's happened!” she said. “I've given birth. Time of arrival: 6:30 a.m!” As I struggled to sort out what was being communicated, I quickly realized this student was celebrating the fact that she had finished her first sermon. Enthusiasm and energy gave testimony to a creative process that had obviously been at work in this preacher's study. She had allowed herself to think deeply about her text, imagining it from many different perspectives. Just as new parents play with potential names for their unborn child, this student had explored numerous ways of naming what she saw in her passage. She had struggled with how she might deliver these truths and, when that final moment of revelation arrived, this student had given birth to a creative work. Her sermon had not only been born on the pages of her manuscript but it had been formed in her heart. She was more than ready for proclamation. The challenge remains for all preachers to ensure adequate time and space is given to dream and imagine our sermons. In so doing, we honour the Spirit's creative process in our work.



Effective preaching is essential to the life and vitality of any congregation. Since the inception of our Movement, the pulpit has been a rallying point for Salvationists. It is from the pulpit that we have heard and understood God's requirements for our lives. We've been challenged by our own sinfulness and our consciences have been awakened toward our mission to serve suffering humanity. Effective preaching has helped congregations forge identity, values and priorities for ministry. Effective preaching has also helped congregations move beyond situations where there has been deep hurt or pain. As preachers extend corporate pastoral care from the pulpit, congregations find ways to move forward because the voice of God is spoken into their immediate situation. Collectively the Body of Christ takes ownership of that message and the life and vitality of the congregation is further shaped in and through the preaching moment.



Preaching still has the power to change the world. We know this to be true because God is still at work in our world today. God has not abandoned his people. He is still speaking; still bringing healing and hope, still pouring out his grace and love on a hurting world. These are the truths that can change our world, for these truths represent the power to change human lives. A few years ago, I had the privilege of attending the Festival of Homiletics, a conference of over 1,000 preachers from across North America. I wondered initially what new insights I would gain about preaching. In the end it wasn't about a theory or a homiletic technique, or even a new way to do preaching. Only a single statement: “There is still hope for the world and it is found in the Gospel of Jesus Christ.”

And so, preacher … this coming Sunday as you stand to deliver “your baby,” take strength from what has been formed in you through those long hours of study and preparation. Remember what it is you believe about preaching and what you believe will show up in your sermon.

julie_slousMajor Julie Slous is corps officer at Winnipeg's Heritage Park Temple. She also serves as adjunct faculty at the College for Officer Training. In May 2009, Julie completed her doctoral studies in biblical preaching. Her thesis work centred on “Preaching a Disturbing Gospel─The Homiletic of The Salvation Army for Postmodern Times.” When not studying and writing, personal hobbies include reading, cooking, musical composition and, of course, listening to sermons! Married to Brian, she has three children.

Comment

On Monday, May 14, 2012, stephen hooper said:

Jesus told His disciples after His resurrection and just before He was taken up to heaven that they should go and make disciples of all nations, baptising them in the name of the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit and teaching them to observe all that He had commanded them (Mt.28:18-20). Jesus Himself had been baptised by John in the River Jordan at the age of 30 just before the beginning of His public ministry (Mt.3:13-17). His disciples obeyed Him and preached baptism also along with the gospel (Ac.2:38). When people repented from their sins and believed in Jesus they were baptised in water (Ac.2:41;8:12,38;9:18;10:48;16:15,33;19:5,Acts 22:16).



General William Booth of The Salvation Army decided in 1882 that the practice of the ordinances of water Baptism should be discontinued. It is hard for people not to feel that omitting Christ's "standing orders" to baptize in water is an act of insubordination to the Commander-in-Chief.

On Friday, July 9, 2010, Geoff said:

To add to what Jon and Julie have written, I agree that it's much easier for worshippers to maintain a focus on a single biblical text. Many churches use lectionaries for this reason as well as to ensure that worshippers get the full range of biblical learning. It also helps preachers stay "fresh" by taking them out of their comfort zones and forcing them to dig deeper into biblical texts they might otherwise avoid.

I think it's OK to range around a little in a sermon (e.g. fitting a particular passage into God's bigger "Story") provided the preacher keeps coming back to the main text. As the husband of someone who speaks English as a second language, I can attest that single-passage sermons are far less disjointed and confusing to her.

Single passages also work well as learning aids in that they help people remember exactly what the preacher spoke about the previous Sunday. It's much easier for the average church-goer to recall the story/passage and extract the Christian principles than to work backward from the principles to the text.

Also, I think people today are more engaged by storytelling (which is naturally present in a single-passage approach) as opposed to a didactic method. I'd much rather be carried along by the story than have someone force fit an alliterative three-point framework.

That said, I admire our corps officers who, whatever their methods, week in and week out stand in front of their congregations and pour their hearts and souls into their sermons. It's a tough task and God forbid we become overly critical of something we've never had to do ourselves.

Just one opinion ... I'd be interested to hear what others think.

Geoff

On Thursday, July 8, 2010, Jon said:

Stephen,

When more than one text is used to support an idea, pastors risk falling into using dangerous systematic theology where biblical texts can be taken out of context. When only one text is used, a pastor can explain the context of the text, the historical significance of the text, and how it can be applied in today's society. Using one text allows for less risk of incorrectly applying texts to situations where they don't really fit.

Short answer from a theology student, but I hope it helps...

Jon

On Thursday, July 8, 2010, Michael said:

The years that I attended a Salvation Army church, the one thing that I struggled with listening to a CO was the lack of education and knowledge expressed in the sermon. Many sermons were created as if they came from a Daily Bread reading and did not relate to modern day. I believe that CO's should take more theological education to be better equip for preaching. My current pastor has a PHD in theology and the insight and passion that is brought to the pulpit in 45 mins amazes me.

On Wednesday, July 7, 2010, Stephen said:

Rob

Regarding the technology peice, great insight. It does need to support the message, and YES, YES, YES it does need to work. As to the cost, again I agree that it can be a financial burden, but maybe this is something that HQ should be assisting with. Who knows, maybe if the SA adds technology it will bring in more people which in turn beings in more money. If we want to minister to those outside our corps buildings, then maybe we need to bring new ways to delivering the message WITHOUT losing/repressing the Army heritage

On Wednesday, July 7, 2010, Rob Henderson said:

From the perspective of someone on the path to ministry, thankyou for your insights. I am left with a couple of thoughts:
(1) You note that Corps Officers often struggle with the balance of administration vs pastoral duties. It is something that as a Salvationist I have encountered many times and have often wondered why, organizationally we insist on reinventing the Biblical wheel. Surely the answers regarding priorities, time and resources lie in Jethro's advice to Moses in the second half of Exodus 18, reinforced by the decision of the Apostles in the first half of Acts 6.
(2) In response to Stephen (above), as someone who has spent many years teaching in many different circumstances, I agree that technology has much to offer, particulalry in making preaching relevant and appealing to the younger generation. There must be clear recognition, however, of the dangers that technology can bring: technology must be there to SUPPORT the message, not to replace it; technology can bring significant frustrations when it fails (that needs to be planned for and rehearsed); and constantly evolving technology can be a difficult financial burden already overstreched Corps.
Blessings.

On Wednesday, July 7, 2010, Stephen said:

I very much enjoyed the article, but I have two questions. In the section entitled "Preaching is a biblical task" you mention that the sermon should be around one single text. Why is that better than showing that one single idea has multiple bible verses to support that idea. Secondly, why do officers seem to not want to use technology? I use technology every day, and the youth will use it even more, but at our corps, they seem to not want to use it apart from putting up the words for songs. I realize that this is a personal choice, but I feel more engaged when I have something to draw my attention to a particular passage or information. Having someone speak at me is an antiquated way of deleivering a message, and I think that our officers need to look at how they can use technology rather than resist it.
Thanks

On Tuesday, July 6, 2010, Kristen said:

Thanks Major for these important reminders as I begin my preaching ministry.

Leave a Comment