life_interruptedIt is with humility and trepidation that I write this article. Humility because I am still learning to make sense of tragedy and unexpected grief. Trepidation because I am aware of the enormous pain associated with the death of a loved one. A theological explanation may do more harm than good for those coping with loss.

Nevertheless, the problem of pain is one that we all struggle with. God's relationship to suffering is complicated and mysterious. For some reason he often seems remote in times of pain or crisis. Where does God fit into our tragedies? If God is all powerful and loves us, why do we have to suffer?

As I see it, there are three possible answers:

1. God caused the tragedy and the resulting grief for reasons known only to him.
2. God did not cause the suffering but allowed it to happen. This explanation is often followed by the argument that God will bring something good out of the tragedy.
3. God was not the cause of the tragedy, but rather the tragedy is a consequence of the fallen world in which we live.

Is God in Control?
The first two explanations—that God causes or allows suffering—stem from the desire to affirm God's sovereignty and absolute control of events. If we look to Scripture there is much to support this view. To suggest that God is not in control, or that things happen outside of God's control, sounds heretical. But why then doesn't he stop tragedy before it happens? Can God have absolute control on the one hand and allow freedom on the other? If we reconsider our definition of “control,” perhaps we can understand the role played by free will.

We tend to think of control in terms of dictators who command unquestioning obedience or a master controller who flicks a switch to produce a programmed response. But what if God's control over us is more like the influence parents have over their children? We exercise authority over them and offer instruction based on our love for them. We teach them according to our own knowledge and experience because we have their best interest at heart. We give them all that they need, but ultimately, they must decide to follow our instructions or not.

Scripture often speaks of our connection to God in terms of a parent-child relationship. If this is the case, then human beings are susceptible to tragic experiences by the choices we make: the drunk driver who kills a child; the tax cheat who gets audited; the adulterer who faces divorce. Surely these “tragedies” were the result of human decision. God did not cause the tragedy. Did he simply allow them to happen so that he could teach us a lesson? What happens when bad behaviour goes unpunished? What about natural disasters such as tsunamis, hurricanes or earthquakes? What about systemic sin, such as poverty or damage to the environment? Who is to blame?

Groaning for Redemption
I'd like to suggest a third theological option. Not only do people make bad decisions─ intentionally or unintentionally─with serious consequences, but many terrible tragedies are also the result of the power of sin that is at loose in the world. Sin is not just individual action, but a condition of our fallen planet. The Apostle Paul writes of our battle against the “powers of this dark world and against the spiritual forces of evil” (see Ephesians 6:12). We are not only the perpetrators of sin, but also the victims of this degradation.

Does this mean that God is not in control? Absolutely not! He is the alpha and the omega, the beginning and the end. The Scriptures emphasize that God will see to it that goodness comes about in his appointed time. In the meantime, we must live as best we can in this world―with the consequences of the fall of humankind and the freedom to choose good or evil.

I cannot accept that senseless tragedy and the accompanying grief is part of God's plan. To hold to this view one would have to conclude that from the beginning of time God determined that cancer would strike, a marriage would be destroyed, a loved one would be killed in a car accident. To suggest that God caused this or allowed it to happen for some greater good does not fit the character of the God of our salvation.

What, then, do we conclude about suffering? We live in a fallen world. The floodgate of sin and death was opened through the bad choice made by Adam and Eve. This has had eternal consequences, not only for humanity but for all of creation that has been groaning for redemption (see Romans 8:22). The perfect world of creation has also been affected by the consequences of sin and death and will continue to suffer until the day when all will be restored.

Many years ago Rabbi Harold Kushner wrote a bestseller entitled When Bad Things Happen to Good People, the story of his discovery of where God fit into his son's progeria (rapid aging disease). The book is not titled “Why Bad Things Happen to Good People” but rather “When Bad Things ….” The title acknowledges that we live in a fallen world where the sun rises and sets and the rains fall on the just and the unjust (see Matthew 5:45).

I'm in His Hands
Where is God in all of this? Where is God when bad things happen? God is with us. That's the mystery. That's the message from Genesis to Revelation. In life and in death, in sickness and in health, in war and in peace, God says that “I am with you always” (see Matthew 28:20).

God often communicates to us in the person who journeys with us in our grief. We see him in the people who gather around to grieve with us so that we are not alone. Although we walk through the valley of the shadow of death, God is with us (see Psalm 23). And while God does not deliberately allow tragedy to bring about good—as though the ends somehow justify the means—by his unlimited grace, redemptive opportunities will often present themselves if we are open enough to see them.

Stanley Ditmer's beautiful chorus I'm in His Hands has brought a tremendous amount of comfort to people in uncertain times. But I must confess that I have difficulty singing these words because they give the impression that God somehow preplans tragedy. In fact, I privately change the words that say, “The days I cannot see have all been planned for me” to “The days I cannot see, you will be there for me.” And the truth continues with, “His way is best, you see; I'm in his hands.”

“For I hold you by your right hand—I, the Lord your God. And I say to you, 'Don't be afraid. I am here to help you' ” (Isaiah 41:13 NLT).

Comment

On Saturday, August 21, 2010, Mark said:

I question your understanding of the nature of God.

"I cannot accept that senseless tragedy and the accompanying grief is part of God’s plan." This is a key statement. The pride of "I cannot accept". Whenever we put our own wisdom over Gods Word we are in trouble. You call it "senseless" but although it is senseless to you, it is not senseless to God. He IS in control and whether we can make sense out of His plan is not only not for us to do, it is something we would have to be God to understand. Have you read Job?

Then you change a theologically accurate song to be inaccurate by removing the sovereignty of God:"In fact, I privately change the words that say, “The days I cannot see have all been planned for me” to “The days I cannot see, you will be there for me.”" Imagine telling people that God is not in control, and He does not know the future. How sad. Of course they have all been planned for you. He's not some psychiatrist in the sky that you run to his couch when tragedy happens. He is in control. He is God. He knows the hairs on your head, and has numbered our days. To remove His sovereignty because you don't understand His plan, or you think YOUR plan is better, is just a misunderstanding of God’s nature. Who are you to claim you know better what is “good” for God to do? To suggest you know better than God what He should cause or allow to happen to His children, is not your place.

You spoke of a book " When Bad Things Happen to Good People". The author certainly doesn't understand God's Word because he would not call ANYONE good. We know that there are none good, no not one. That is the cornerstone of the Gospel, that we are all evil and wicked and in need of a Saviour. If you think you are good, you will never understand the need for the cross.

You called poverty and damage to the environment “systemic sin”, when neither of those is any kind of sin! Is there a commandment “thou shalt not live in poverty”? No, poverty is not a sin. Neither is caving to the religion of the eco-terrorists who follow the likes of Al Gore, and his lies.

It is not surprising to hear people removing the power and sovereignty of God, since the General himself doesn’t even believe the miracles in scripture. He thinks that creation was not a miracle, and there was death before sin. How sad. We don’t even hold scripture up to being true any longer, but we cave to the atheistic religion of evolution. The general also condones abortion if the child is not "perfect" ... which is the biggest tragedy of all. Now the Salvation Army is on a boycott list. Well done, General. What miracle will you deny next? The virgin birth? The resurrection? Both of those can also be disproved by 'science'. You seem to love the theories of science more than the truth of God.

You cannot make sense out of difficult issues in life if you deny the Word of God.

We need leaders who will defend God’s Word to the death, not sacrifice truth to become more like the world.

On Thursday, April 16, 2009, Amy Reardon said:

Dear Major,

I just read your article, "Life Interrupted," in Salvationist.CA. Thank you for this sensitive piece. You have offered something real, something people can hang on to in hard times.

I have always embraced the Arminian–based doctrine of The Salvation Army. But it seems to me that our understanding of free will, and its consequences, has become quite diluted—a casualty, perhaps, of evangelical ecumenism. Our interpretation of the sovereignty of God has grown misshapen - it has taken a form that Luther, I think, would well recognize - but not Wesley or Booth. I do not mean to imply that we should cling to ideas simply because they are traditional to our heritage. (Nor do I mean to say that I oppose ecumenism.) I only mean that if we did not consider our Arminian doctrinal roots to be utterly biblical, we wouldn't be Salvationists, would we? Perhaps we have ceased to teach our own biblical persuasion and have forced Salvationists to learn grand doctrinal themes through Christian television and radio and the like.

Anyway, I really appreciate your answer to suffering and your explanation of the sovereignty of God. I have cut out your article and plan to make use of it as need arises. I'll begin by giving a copy of it to a friend who is going through divorce. The divorce was not some scheme of God's that he had plotted against her to teach her some lesson. It's the fallout of living in this sin–sick world, which you so aptly explained in your article.

May you be greatly blessed!

Grace,
Amy

On Tuesday, April 7, 2009, henry armstrong said:

Dear Brian .. Yes we all have asked the why guestion. Great book to read and promote. Will you Choose Joy? Captain Normajean Honsberger diagnosed with breast cancer in 1992, she lost her beloved husband Al to cancer in the midst of her own struggle. She was promoted to Glory May 2 2000 at the age of 40. befor her death she preach a series of sermons on Philippians that earned the nick name of Captain Joy. With the book comes a DVD with Normajeans testimony, photos and recordings of her husbands music Book produced by the Others Press Eastern territory special price $9.99 US .General rader says Opening her heart and illuminating the message of Philippians with lessons learned in the lonely hours when it seemed all hope was gone ,Normajean shines a radiant light on the path of reality we all must walk. A great book for officers to read and give. Yours truly Henry.. Just passing by,

On Thursday, April 2, 2009, Philip Brace said:

Major Armstrong,

My view exactly. With our limited understanding, it's the only one that makes theological sense. I - like you - have many questions still, most of which will remain unanswered in this life. I do marvel, though, at those times when God does intervene - when He does effect a miracle of healing, for example. His sovereignty precludes my asking the question,"Why, Lord? Why him and not her?" I know that "our mind matters" - as J.B. Phillips has written - but I also feel that we walk in wonders beyond ourselves when we try to fathom the sheer mysteries that surround us. C.S. Lewis wasn't far off the mark when he said, "To enter heaven one must stoop until he is no taller than a little child."

On Wednesday, April 1, 2009, Stuart said:

Thanks for writing on this topic. I wonder if the question of suffering despite a loving God, could be answered without reference to Adam and Eve. Did picking that apple really give us thousands of years of pain? I suspect Eve did not appreciate the consequences of her actions to say the least. Leaving the mythological Adam and Eve aside, I would like to hear an answer for why our loving heavenly Father allows children, too young to appreciate the difference between right and wrong, to be abused. My faith depends on it.

Leave a Comment